Kicks Condor

Reply: Piranesi and His Prisons


I suppose Clarke is the only author out there who’d conceivably write a whole novel about Piranesi and his Prisons. I look forward to reading it!

Oh wow - didn’t realize the backstory on this! Thank you for taking the time to fill us in and sharing your essay/portrait. This amps up my (already considerable) excitement. And now I have something to read before Piranesi hits!

I’m not a fantasy reader at all - I have a difficult time connecting with the genre - I can’t seem to make it through Lord of the Rings even. (I enjoyed The Chronicles of Amber when I was a child.) But I actually view Jonathan Strange as literary fiction. It feels more like a pastiche of Dickens, Austen and other 19th Century literary fiction (probably Henry James, too) rather than fantasy. (I’m also a big fan of Don Quixote and J.L. Borges - so perhaps I am a fantasy fan in a way.)

Anyway, this comment of yours gets my hopes up that she has another pastiche in store, because she has to be one of the most talented stylers of this rare art that the world has ever encountered. (I guess it’s funny that I should say this off the strength of only one book - but it’s a mighty long book and one of the few that is entitled to such thickness.)

  1. I think you hit on it: Clarke’s fantasy is more literary than genre.

    These days, my taste for fantasy/speculative fiction has become more refined; straight-up, empty-calorie genre fantasy no longer satisfies. I find spec-fic authors like M. John Harrison and Gene Wolfe (if the spec-fic/SF genre can lay claim to a “literary” label, Wolfe has certainly claimed it) much more engaging to the mind. If Clarke is anything like them, then I think my reading taste has now matured enough to appreciate her.

This post accepts webmentions. Do you have the URL to your post?

You may also leave an anonymous comment. All comments are moderated.


This page is also at kickscofbk2xcp5g.onion and on dat://.